The mean-variance portfolio theory says that any investor will choose the optimal portfolio from the set of portfolios that:
Again, consider a situation where you have two stocks to choose from: A and B. You can invest your entire wealth in one of these two securities. Or you can invest 10% in A and 90% in B, or 20% in A and 80%in B, or 70% in A and 30% in B, or... There are a huge number of possible combinations even in the simple case of two securities. Imagine the different combinations you have to consider when you have thousands of stocks.
The minimum-variance frontier shows the minimum variance that can be achieved for a given level of expected return. To construct the minimum-variance frontier of a portfolio:
The outcome of risk-return combinations generated by portfolios of risky assets gives you the minimum variance for a given rate of return. Logically, any set of combinations formed by two risky assets with less than perfect correlation will lie inside the triangle XYZ and will be convex.
Investors will never want to hold a portfolio below the minimum variance point. They will always get higher returns along the positively sloped part of the minimum-variance frontier.
The efficient frontier is the set of mean-variance combinations from the minimum-variance frontier where, for a given risk, no other portfolio offers a higher expected return.
Any point beneath the efficient frontier is inferior to points above. Moreover, any points along the efficient frontier are, by definition, superior to all other points for that combined risk-return tradeoff.
Portfolios on the efficient frontier have different return and risk measures. As you move upward along the efficient frontier, both risk and the expected rate of return of the portfolio increase, and no one portfolio can dominate any other on the efficient frontier. An investor will target a portfolio on the efficient frontier on the basis of his attitude toward risk and his utility curves.
The concept of efficient frontier narrows down the options of the different portfolios from which the investor may choose. For example, portfolios at points A and B offer the same risk, but the one at point A offers a higher return for the same risk. No rational investor will hold the portfolio at point B and therefore we can ignore it. In this case, A dominates B. In the same way, C dominates D.
|americade: only the upward sloping part is the efficient frontier|
| scancubus: The efficient frontier is the line.|
"The portfolios on the efficient frontier have different return and risk measures. As you move upward along the efficient frontier, both risk and the expected rate of return of the portfolio increase, and no one can dominate any other on the efficient frontier."
|dmfcrowe: One of my favourite quotes "diversification is for people who dont know what they're doing" (Warren Buffet). All nice and pretty mathematically but not particularly usefull in the real world.|
|johntan1979: If you want to quote someone, at least get the spelling right.|
|jonan203: for the past few months, i have been thoroughly entertained by jt1979s witty comments, keep em coming!|
|ldfrench: Ah, yes, Warren Buffet. The greatest all-you-can-eat buffet diner in the land.|
|khalifa92: in the end it doesnt even matter|
|albacrow: The joke of it is Harry Markowitz kept all his $ in cash and bonds, the donut. Practice what you preach kidda.|
|albacrow: khalifa92 - true dat lol|