Consider two mutual funds, D (specialized in bonds and debt securities) and E (specialized in equity). The weight of mutual fund D in the portfolio is w

Expected return of the portfolio: E(r

Variance of the portfolio: σ

If the two assets are not perfectly positively correlated, the standard deviation of the portfolio is less than the weighted average of the standard deviations of the assets.

Covariance of returns measures the degree to which the rates of return on two securities

- A
*positive*covariance indicates that the rates of return on the two securities tend to move in the*same*direction. - A
*negative*covariance indicates that the rates of return on the two securities tend to move in*opposite*directions. - A covariance of
*zero*indicates that there is*no*relationship between the rates of return on the two securities.

The magnitude of the covariance depends on the magnitude of the individual stocks' standard deviations and the relationship between their co-movements. The

The measure can be standardized by dividing the covariance by the standard deviations of the two securities being tested.

Rearranging the terms gives: cov

The term

How should you interpret the correlation coefficient?

- A correlation coefficient of +1 means that returns always move together in the same direction. They are perfectly positively correlated.
- A correlation coefficient of -1 means that returns always move in completely opposite directions. They are perfectly negatively correlated.
- A correlation coefficient of zero means that there is no relationship between the two stocks' returns. They are uncorrelated.

Two risky assets, A and B, have the following scenarios of returns:

What is the covariance between the returns of A and B?

The expected return is a probability-weighted average of the returns. Using this definition, the expected return of A is 0.35 * 10% + 0.35*(-4%) + 0.3*(9%) = 4.8%. The expected return of B is 0.35 * 7% + 0.35*(4%) + 0.3*(-6%) = 2.05%.

The covariance between the returns equals the expected value of the product of the deviations of the individual returns from their means.

To calculate this, we construct the following table:

The expected value of the product of the deviations is 0.35 * 5.2% * 4.95% + 0.35 * (-8.8%) * 1.95% + 0.3*4.2%*(-8.05%) = -0.0714%.

The

- The weighted average of the individual variances, plus
- The weighted covariances between all the assets in the portfolio.

When an asset is added to a large portfolio with many assets, the new asset affects the portfolio's standard deviation in two ways. It affects:

- The asset's own variance, and
- Covariance between this asset and
*every other asset*in the portfolio. The effect of these numerous covariances will outweigh the effect of the asset's own variance. The more assets in the portfolio, the more this is true.

Therefore, the important factor to consider when adding an investment to a portfolio is not the investment's own variance, but its

Adding securities that are not perfectly positively correlated with each other will reduce the standard deviation of the portfolio. The lower (higher) the correlations between the returns of assets in the portfolio, the lower (higher) the portfolio risk, and thus the higher (lower) the diversification benefits. The ultimate benefit of diversification occurs when the correlation between two assets is -1.00.

The graph below shows a portfolio with an overall standard deviation of zero, thus creating a risk-free portfolio. This occurs when two assets are combined, each moving in an opposite direction. For example, imagine a portfolio of investments, one of which moves with sun-related activities (e.g., sunglasses) and the other in the direction of rain-related activities (e.g., umbrellas). The combined portfolio of sunglasses and umbrellas ought to negate weather-related issues (theoretically speaking), as the two assets move in opposite directions.

- Returns on A move in the opposite direction from returns on B.
- The mid-point between A and B represents the mean return with no variability in returns.
- The overall standard deviation of this portfolio is zero.
- This is considered a risk-free portfolio.

In a portfolio with two assets, the ideal scenario provides a contrast in asset returns similar to the "saw tooth" diagram shown above. Thus, one asset would completely offset the other asset (in terms of risk) providing a smooth rate of return with no variability. This, of course, could only occur if the two assets had a perfect negative correlation.

The maximum amount of risk reduction is predetermined by the correlation coefficient.

Let's re-visit our very first example. The portfolio opportunity set shows the portfolio return and risk for different ρs.

What is the standard deviation of a portfolio (E) assuming the following data?

σ

Solution:

Cov

Standard Deviation of Portfolio = 0.10 (perfect correlation)

If there are three securities in the portfolio, its standard deviation is:

A

There are many ways to diversify investment risk.

- Diversify with asset classes.
- Diversify with index funds.
- Diversify among countries.
- Diversify by not owning your employer's stock.
- Evaluate each asset before adding it to a portfolio.
- Buy insurance for risky portfolios.

Iyal: What is the difference b/ween correlation & Covariance? |

billou: the unit |

katybo: correlation is a standarized measure (between -1 and 1) |

julamo: Covariance is used to measure correlation. Correlation is the term you use, covariance is the calculation used to define it.Correlation = covariance / Product of individual Standard deviations |

nsmwaura: I see correlation as a standardized measure much like the coefficient of variation. Standardizing means you can compare all portfolio on the same standards. |

teddajr: covariance between the returns equals SUM of the expected value of the product of the deviations of the individual returns from their means |

ljamieson: cov(X,Y) = E[(X-E[X])(Y-E[Y])] |

soarer1: "Co" variance = for two random variablesVariance = single variable |

luccky: co variance cam be between -infinity to +infinity, and corelation in between -1 to +1 |

bjornfu: Another way to think about it: Correlation: How OFTEN assets move together. Covariance: How FAR they move together. |

hit81: Correlation: Defines a broad class of measurements for Dependendent Assets of PortfolioCovariance: Defines a measurement of variability/risk together of all Assets of portfolio. |

thekobe: think about variance as the covariance of the asset with itself, thus you have to square. |

jonan203: fun stuff |

Yeelian: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/11/calculating-covariance.aspThere's a good, clear example here on the differences between correlation and covariance ^ |