- CFA Exams
- 2023 Level I
- Topic 1. Quantitative Methods
- Learning Module 2. Multiple Regression
- Subject 11. Serial Correlation

### Why should I choose AnalystNotes?

AnalystNotes specializes in helping candidates pass. Period.

##### Subject 11. Serial Correlation PDF Download

**Serial correlation**occurs when the regression residuals are correlated across observations. The problem arises when we are studying

*time series*data. For example, data concerning annual savings and annual income for one family for 10 consecutive years are time series data. With time series data, the order in which the observations are made is important. Serially correlated errors can occur in time series studies because random events that influence Y in period (t - 1) can have lingering effects that influence Y in the following period t. If this is the case, we say that the random disturbances e

_{i-1}and e

_{i}are serially correlated.

With time series data, however, successive errors often tend to be positively correlated. That is, positive errors tend to be followed by positive errors, and negative errors tend to be followed by negative errors, because random events that cause positive errors in one period have lasting effects that also cause positive errors in the next period.

Although the estimated parameters may be accurate, the standard errors for the coefficients are affected by positive serial correlation. Typically, positive serial correlation causes OLS standard errors for the coefficients to underestimate the true standard errors. As a consequence, if positive serial correlation is present in the regression, standard linear regression analysis will lead us to compute artificially small standard errors for the regression parameters. These small standard errors will cause the estimated t-statistics to be inflated, suggesting significance where perhaps there is none. The inflated t-statistics may, in turn, lead us to incorrectly reject null hypotheses about parameters of the regression model more often than we would if the standard errors were correctly estimated. This type I error could lead to improper investment recommendations.

The test that is used most often to test for the presence of serially correlated error terms is called the Durbin-Watson test. See los n for details.

There are two methods to reduce or eliminate serial correlation bias.

- First, the standard errors of the regression coefficients can be adjusted to reflect the serial correlation. The resulting standard errors are referred to as "
**robust standard errors**."*Hansen's method*, which can be found in many statistical software packages, is the most prevalent method for adjusting standard errors. - The second method involves a reconfiguration of the equation defining the regression. By utilizing this correction method, the regression equation is modified in an attempt to mitigate the autocorrelation bias. This course of action, i.e., reconfiguring the regression equation, should be taken with extreme care, as slight miscalculations can result in invalid estimates for the underlying regression parameters.
- When encountered by a regression suffering from serial correlation bias, analysts are encouraged to correct for the autocorrelation by adjusting the coefficient standard errors to account for the serial correlation.

**Learning Outcome Statements**

CFA® 2023 Level I Curriculum, Volume 1, Module 2

###
**User Contributed Comments**
4

User |
Comment |
---|---|

danlan2 |
Two methods: robust standard errors and reconfiguration, similar to heteroskedasticity. |

REITboy |
D-W Statistic = (Sum of squared differences between sequential residuals) OVER (Sum of squared residuals) If n is large, DW Stat is approximated by: DW = 2(1-r) where r = correlation coefficient between sequential squared residuals DW < 2 implies positive serial correlation DW = 2 implies no serial correlation DW > 2 implies negative serial correlation |

REITboy |
...guess I should have waited for the next reading... |

philjoe |
hahahaha |

I passed! I did not get a chance to tell you before the exam - but your site was excellent. I will definitely take it next year for Level II.