III. DUTIES TO CLIENTS
1. When Members and Candidates are in an advisory relationship with a client, they must:
2. When Members and Candidates are responsible for managing a portfolio to a specific mandate, strategy, or style, they must only make investment recommendations or take investment actions that are consistent with the stated objectives and constraints of the portfolio.
Members must always consider the appropriateness and suitability of the client's investment action and match this up against the needs and circumstances of the particular client in order to determine the suitability of the investment for the client.
In the event that a new client is obtained or an existing client's previous investment matures, the member need not immediately obtain client information if he or she first re-invests these funds in some form of cash equivalent. The member will then obtain the client's investment preferences. He or she will need to determine from the client the level of risk that the client is prepared to accept (in other words, the client's risk tolerance level). This needs to be ascertained before any investment action is taken.
You are required to:
You are NOT required to change an existing client portfolio as soon as it comes under your discretion; it is best to take a bit of time, plan and implement actions in an organized way.
Procedures for compliance
A written investment policy statement should be developed.
The investor's objectives and constraints should be maintained and reviewed periodically to reflect any changes in the client's circumstances. Annual review is reasonable unless business or other reasons dictate more or less frequent review.
After a five-minute interview, you advise a client how to invest a substantial proportion of her wealth. You have violated the "Know your customer" rule. You do not have adequate basis to make a detailed recommendation.
An analyst tells a client about the upside potential, without discussing the downside risks. He violates the standard because he should discuss the downside risks as well.
When recommending an investment to a client, an analyst mainly focuses on the characteristics of the specific investment. He violates the standard because the primary focus for determining the suitability of an investment should be on the characteristics of the entire portfolio.
Should a firm move from a fundamental approach to selecting stocks to a more technically-based model, it would need to communicate this change to all of its current and prospective clients. Clients must always be made aware of the risk of investing as well as possible downside risks. The portfolio must always be looked at as a whole.
The portfolio managers at DD Investing sit down with Danielle to analyze her needs and circumstances. While discussing her position with her, they find out that a wealthy cousin left her $500,000 as part of her inheritance. This triples the size of her current portfolio. As a result of the increased funds, Danielle's willingness to assume risk has increased; she can now bear more risk. Therefore, the portfolio managers should now invest more funds in the equity side of her portfolio, to increase risk and potential returns.
A client requests to change his investment strategy from investing in North-American blue chips to emphasizing countries with high economic growth rates. The portfolio manager should explain the potential risks and returns to the client, and ask him to consider them before changing the investment strategy.
An investment manager uses the proceeds of some high yielding securities to invest 20% of the client's portfolio in a high-risk stock, because he believes that a merger is in place and will push the price of the stock up. He will then sell the stock and repurchase other high-yielding securities. The client depends on the portfolio for her support. The manager has violated this standard, since he has not considered the effects of each transaction within the context of the entire portfolio.
|ambar: Example 7 is good|
|rhardin: I thought example 2 was Misrepresentation, not Suitability... any thoughts?|
|chamad: It may not be suitable to the client if the client considers the downside risks|
|NikolaZ: I agree that it is more misrepresentation as well, as it is in a way exaggerating the benefits of investing by omitting the downside risks.|
|Corey678: rhardin- I think it can be considered both misrepresentation and suitability. Depending on the risk it may not be suitable for the portfolio and client may not agree, but also misrepresents the potential risk. A lot of these are in between.|
|gerdvar: Arent most examples and situations a mix of more than one Standard?|
|leeboy: @ambar why is example 7 good? are you planning to do that to your clients?? I've got my eye on you mate.|
|dbalakos: I have the feeling that most Standards overlap each other...|
|kingirm: Know your custome|