- CFA Exams
- CFA Level I Exam
- Study Session 6. Financial Reporting and Analysis (1)
- Reading 20. Financial Reporting Standards
- Subject 7. Monitoring Developments in Financial Reporting Standards
CFA Practice Question
Select the three most useful types of discussions regarding the impact of recently issued accounting changes in management's discussion.
II. The standard will have no material impact.
III. Management is still evaluating the impact.
IV. The impact of adoption is discussed.
I. The standard does not apply.
II. The standard will have no material impact.
III. Management is still evaluating the impact.
IV. The impact of adoption is discussed.
A. I, II and III
B. I, II and IV
C. II, III and IV
Explanation: III creates some uncertainty about whether the change might materially affect the company.
IV would be the most meaningful discussion.
User Contributed Comments 12
User | Comment |
---|---|
jgraham6 | The third bullet, taken specifically from the LOS, states: The impact of recently issued accounting changes. The conclusions include: * The standard does not apply; * The standard will have no material impact; * Management is still evaluating the impact; or * The impact of adoption is discussed. |
nneks | yes it does state that but the question asks for the three most useful! |
najat | I understand that "Management is still evaluating the impact" isn't very helpful but I don't get why "The impact of adoption is discussed" would be more useful? because if the changes are adopted, then the impact could be material or non-material, we still don't know...? |
justbassbaby | why "adoption is discussed" more meaningful than "have no material impact" and "standard does not apply"? |
endurance | the question only asks for three choises out of four - pick the three most useful here - B is correct |
dybacis | "Adoption is discussed" means they actually give a number and explain the impact |
siggarusfigs | I agree with dybacis, but what I don't get is why "does not apply" or "no impact" are more useful than "still evaluating" |
Megumirox | yeah i agree with siggarusfigs. It doesn't makes sense to me that "does not apply" or " no impact" are more useful than "still evaluating" |
Shaan23 | NO MATERIAL impact....that means no materiality --- means this has nothing to do with the price and has no affect --- Conclusion is stated. III is still evaluating so no conclusion....therefor not as useful guys. |
rjdelong | Questinon asks for "most useful DISCUSSIONS on these NEW STANDARDS I - Standard does not apply - Present Financials Presently Unaffected If they do not apply, that pretty much sums it up, but more details on how that might change that in future (that they will apply might change) II Applies but no material impact - if they do apply we want details on how and why they aren't material impact bc they very well may in our opinion III. Still Evaluating I and II and IV as well... IV. Changes have admitted (def) impact and details are know n be needed in present and future |
Benbracey | I see a lot of people asking why 'The Standard does not apply' and 'The Standard will have no material impact' are not useful. Surely it seems obvious that if they have reached a conclusion that nothing is affected it's better than the unknown? It is useful to know it has been evaluated and no changes (or changes), rather than 'hmmmm..' |
bwhitele | As a shareholder it is more re-assuring hearing one of those 3 options as they are better than uncertainty |